Excerpt: Women in Japanese Studies

Women in Japanese Studies

Bringing together stories and reflections spanning more than thirty years, Women in Japanese Studies: Memoirs from a Trailblazing Generation will be released by AAS Publications in December 2023. Edited by Alisa Freedman (University of Oregon), the volume includes chapters from thirty-one scholars, who share stories of achievements, frustrations, and choices—both professional and personal. In Japan and North America, Freedman writes, contributors to the collection “established their careers during an eventful thirty years that indelibly shaped international relations, universities, academic jobs, and women’s roles in the workplace and the family.” A celebration of this generation’s contributions to not only Japanese Studies, but Asian Studies as a whole, this book will educate and inspire younger scholars looking ahead to their own academic careers.

The excerpt below is adapted from a chapter by Barbara Ruch (pronounced “Roosh”), professor emerita at Columbia University and the founder (1968) of the IMJS: Institute for Japanese Cultural Heritage Initiatives, where she still serves as director. Ruch first visited Japan in 1954, a recent college graduate traveling by freighter to work on postwar relief efforts with the American Friends Service Committee (AFSC). Returning to the United States four years later, she enrolled in graduate school, first at the University of Pennsylvania and then Columbia University, studying Japanese language and literature. Ruch joined the Harvard faculty before returning to both Penn and Columbia for positions at those institutions. For her pioneering work on Japanese culture, she received the inaugural Minakata Kumagusu Prize (1991), the Aoyama Nao Prize for Women’s History (1992, first non-Japanese recipient), the 42nd Bukkyō Dendō Kyōkai (BDK) Award (2008, first female and non-Japanese recipient), the Kyoto Governor’s Culture Award (2011), and other honors. She is the only academic awarded the Imperial Decoration, Order of the Precious Crown, with Butterfly Crest (1999). Since 2006, she has directed the Columbia/Barnard/Juilliard Gagaku-Hōgaku heritage instrumental music performance program.


Day of Infamy

To say that Japanese Studies was conceived in 1941 is not exactly accurate. Affluent elites who had the leisure and the means to satisfy their interests had, since the early nineteenth century, begun their great archaeologies and ownership-assemblage of objects of beauty from Egypt to Japan.

Until bombs and torpedoes did their work, however, Japanese Studies was not a recognized program of academic pursuit in the universities of the world. The fact of the matter is that, without the huge investment of American military money and personnel, it is doubtful that Japanese Studies would exist as it does today in our universities.

The role of the US military as father to Japanese Studies presented me with a dilemma. As an anti-war Quaker, I had gotten into trouble with my peers in high school for refusing to compete for sales of war bonds and stamps, competitions that, after all, were not about selling cookies but were to raise funds to buy bullets, bayonets, and bombs to kill not only enemy soldiers and but also millions of innocent civilians living in their way. With the war over, however, I was forced to view the role of the US military also as a revelation when I realized they had organized, funded, and educated in Japanese language almost every graduate school professor under whom I was to study or whose books I was assigned to read, including Wm. Theodore de Bary, Howard Hibbett, Donald Keene, Ivan Morris, E. Dale Saunders, and Edward Seidensticker.


Home to Philadelphia and on to New York

I lived a lifetime of unforgettable days and years in Japan about which I’ll write one day but not here; it was then AFSC work to repair destroyed lives, not academic.

In Philadelphia in 1958, however, I was lucky, probably beyond anything imaginable today. The University of Pennsylvania’s Oriental Studies Department, world-famous for Ancient Near Eastern and Indian Studies, had recently added Japanese language and literature. They admitted me easily and awarded me a work-study fellowship.

Those were happy days among gentlemanly professors who treated me seriously and shared freely their own excitement about their respective fields. That atmosphere bred in me the desire to continue. How could I stop halfway? I even spent a long sweaty “no-AC” summer in a dorm at Columbia University studying more advanced Japanese language with the kind, severe, magnificent teacher Ichiro Shirato; he gave me a true sense of confidence in the language for the first time and made me comfortable at Columbia. I targeted Columbia doctoral study because of him and the presence of a young assistant professor, Donald Keene, and his awe-inspiring mentor, Tsunoda Ryūsaku. The Ford Foundation was then generously supporting “area studies,” and, after I was vetted by Robert Scalapino, they committed to funding my entire four-year doctoral program at Columbia.

Nowhere in those late-1950s days in Japan and studying in Philadelphia had there been any hint that being a female was a hindrance. Those joyful, carefree days, however, came to an end when I entered my doctoral courses at Columbia, the only woman among a dozen men. Most have now vanished from the scene, but some who became prominent in the field were blatant in their disapproval of me among them: “What are you doing here?” “What do you want?” “You should be at home having babies and not toying with graduate study and usurping grants that are intended for serious men like us.” It was all so adolescent that it did not make me waver; it was just unpleasantly annoying, like flies in summer.

There would be times much later, however, when, with obtuse but I’m sure the best of intentions, women colleagues would tell me how lucky I was not to have had to juggle motherhood with an academic life, as they did, not knowing that the deaths of my two daughters, Laura and Sarah, who had not lived into their childhoods, were never to me a fortunate roll of the dice.


Founding the Donald Keene Center of Japanese Culture

In the 1970s, Donald Keene asked me to take on one semester of his Columbia courses every year so that he could spend that term yearly in Japan. In the late 1970s, therefore, I commuted to Columbia one day a week. In 1984, I moved full-time to the faculty of my doctoral alma mater, and Columbia agreed to house the IMJS as well.

Despite his worldwide renown, word had come down from on high in 1985 that, when Donald Keene retired one mandatory day not too far off, Columbia would likely not replace him. University needs had higher priority than teaching “the exotic subject” of Japanese literature. Clearly, endowment was the only guarantee of survival and continuity. All agreed, but no one stirred. Others, without their name already crowning something similar, vociferously opposed the founding of a Keene Center. If the IMJS was anything, I thought, it was an engine for cultural rescue. I went around to colleagues’ offices to gather ideas and support.

One prefers to forget the laborious, pitted, and rock-filled road to successful actualization. A certain senior professor knocked the wind out of me with unforgettable words: “You women have too much time on your hands,” he said. “You will fail and you will bring shame to our university.”

This was not male students throwing verbal-harassment spitballs at females. Not annoying flies in summer. This was full artillery from a general. I still have the holes in my heart.

But tenacity is a necessary quality. As is flexibility. So on my own I went to Japan. Major Japanese literary figures, Japanese friends of Donald Keene, some of whom I, too, knew well, joined me in Tokyo to plead the case to the Japanese public.

A year later, with hard work, we successfully raised the several million dollars needed to create an endowed chair, the Shinchō Chair of Japanese Literature for Donald Keene, the anchor for the new (1986) Donald Keene Center of Japanese Culture (DKC). Everyone then wanted ownership of the newborn, however. For four years, I served as its director, and after getting programs started, I was able to pass the directorship over to another colleague in 1990. Happily, the DKC has been preserving Japanese literature at Columbia for more than thirty years now.

A Korean nun once said to me, “When you hit an obstacle, become as water and flow around it.”


Excerpt adapted from Barbara Ruch, “‘In Search of Flowers Yet Unseen,’” in Alisa Freedman, editor, Women in Japanese Studies: Memoirs from a Trailblazing Generation (Association for Asian Studies, forthcoming).

AsiaNow Speaks with Tao Jiang

Tao Jiang is Professor of Religion and Philosophy at Rutgers University in New Brunswick, NJ, and the author of Origins of Moral-Political Philosophy in Early China, published by Oxford University Press, which received Honorable Mention of the 2023 Joseph Levenson Prize for distinguished scholarship on pre-1900 China.

To begin with, please tell us what your book is about.

Origins of Moral-Political Philosophy in Early China retells the founding story of Chinese moral-political philosophy. It makes three key points. First, the central intellectual challenge during the pre-Qin period (5th-3rd centuries BCE) was how to negotiate the relationships between the personal, the familial, and the political domains when philosophers were reimagining and reconceptualizing a new sociopolitical order, due to the collapse of the old order. They offered a dazzling array of competing visions for that newly imagined order. Second, the competing visions were a contestation between impartialist justice and partialist humaneness as the guiding norms of the newly imagined moral-political order, with the Confucians, the Mohists, the Laoists, and the fajia (Legalist) thinkers being the major participants, constituting the mainstream intellectual project during this foundational period of Chinese philosophy. Third, Zhuangzi and the Zhuangists were the outliers of the mainstream moral-political debate who rejected the very parameter of humaneness versus justice. The Zhuangists were a lone voice advocating personal freedom. For them, the mainstream debate was intellectually banal, morally misguided, and politically dangerous. Importantly, all those philosophical efforts took place within the context of an evolving understanding of Heaven and its relationship with the humans.

What inspired you to research this topic?

I was unsatisfied with the existing narratives about early Chinese philosophy that separate philosophical analyses from historical inquiries. My goal was to find a way to integrate historical scholarship in retelling the story about the development of early Chinese philosophy on the one hand while explore the inner logic and philosophical dialectic of moral-political projects embedded in the early texts on the other hand. I am interested in delving into granular details of the texts and figuring out how they reshape the larger picture. My aspiration is to lose sight of neither the trees nor the forest.

Moreover, so much has changed in the study of early China over the last thirty years, especially due to the availability of excavated texts and the explosion of new translations and creative scholarship. This means that existing narratives, based on dated scholarship, need updating and rethinking.

All these factors motivated me to craft a new narrative that can incorporate recent materials and tell a new and more nuanced story about early Chinese philosophy that is historically sensitive and philosophically compelling.

What obstacles did you face in this project? What turned out better and/or easier than you expected it would?

The biggest challenge is its scale. There is just so much ground to cover and so much secondary literature to consult. The overall framework needs to be organically built from the ground up and cannot come across as something forced. I was also worried that anybody who is a specialist in a particular figure or school (and there are many) can pick on it. However, without presenting the whole picture with all the intricate and often surprising connections among its various parts, I would not have been able to tell a new story with necessary nuance. The reception, at least so far, seems to have vindicated my approach.

What is the most interesting story or scrap of research you encountered in the course of working on this book?

Some years ago, a colleague, when he learned about my project, asked me whether there was anything in those early texts that hadn’t already been studied. Indeed, the materials appear to be well-trodden and familiar to specialists in the field. Interestingly, another colleague, after reading my book, told me that he was surprised by how many materials in it that he had never noticed. What I have found out is that there are still a lot of materials that are understudied or simply ignored, even on Confucius and the Analects. For example, many people are familiar with Confucius’ short autobiography, but I was really surprised that there is virtually no discussion about the bizarre nature of his famous claim that he learned about the heavenly mandate at the age of fifty. Confucius was in no position to claim any relationship with Heaven, the divine legitimizer of a political regime. His daring claim points to a subversive streak that has not been properly appreciated in Chinese intellectual history.

Another quick example. Although many scholars have written about the (negative) Golden Rule in the Analects, often in comparison with the biblical tradition, few people seem interested in finding out what happened to the Golden Rule after the Analects. This means that there is a lack of systematic treatment of the trajectory of core concepts like the Golden Rule (shu) and its role in moral reasoning among the early Chinese texts. What I have found is that it was actually the Mohists, the famous critics of the Confucian project, who pushed the Golden Rule in the Analects to its logical conclusion, leading to the first articulate concept of universal justice in Chinese intellectual history. On the other hand, the self-professed followers of Confucius, e.g., Mencius, basically dropped the Golden Rule altogether. There are huge implications in understanding the different nature of various early Chinese moral-political projects due to their different treatment of the Golden Rule and I explore them in great details in the book.

What are the works that inspired you as you worked on this book, and/or what are some other titles that you recommend be read in tandem with your own?

One pleasant surprise in the early reception of my book is that many historians of early China (what I call Sinologists in the book) appear to be receptive to it. It is gratifying to see my effort to bridge historical and philosophical approaches to the study of early Chinese texts bearing some fruit. If this is indeed the case, some credit should go to Michael Nylan, one of the most prominent historians of early China whom I did not know in person when writing the book. What makes Nylan rare among the early China historians is that she does not ignore works of Chinese philosophy. In her engagements with philosophical scholarship on the early Chinese texts, Nylan implores philosophers to take more seriously historical scholarship that can better inform our works. I took such a critique to heart and tried to incorporate as much historical scholarship as possible. At the same time, I have developed a methodology for the philosophical approach to the early texts so that the scholarly objects of philosophical inquiries can be preserved instead of being explained away by historians.

Finally, what has captured your attention lately—as a reader, writer, scholar, professor, or person living in the world?

One thing I realized after spending fifteen years on this book is that I don’t have an infinite amount of time to do big projects like this. It is a rude awakening for me that my professional life has an expiration date! This means that I should be careful in picking my next big project. Even though I have several big projects already going on while writing the Origins (several are on Buddhist thought which is my other area of specialization) which partially explains why it took me fifteen years to finish it, my book talks and the many book reviews (there are ten already, plus a book symposium in Philosophy East and West with me engaging six critics) have generated a lot of fascinating questions I hope to explore further.

I want to pick up where I left off in the conclusion of my book that is a musing about an untraveled path in Chinese history, i.e., the synthesis of the fajia/Legalist thought and ideas from the Zhuangzi. I have started to sketch out some basic ideas for a political philosophy, drawing inspirations from the Zhuangzi which has usually been read as spiritually rich but politically irrelevant, both in Chinese history and in contemporary scholarship. I am excited about this project even though it is not entirely clear to me yet where that might lead me or how long it might take me, similar to the Origins which started out as a book on the Zhuangzi only!

The Vietnam Studies Group 2024 Graduate Paper Prize Competition

Deadline: Friday September 29, 2023

The Vietnam Studies Group (VSG) is pleased to announce a call for submissions for its annual graduate student paper prize competition. The competition encourages the direct involvement of graduate students in the growth of Vietnamese studies and supports their professional development. The competition is open to full- and part-time graduate students at any level, regardless of their disciplinary specialization. Preference will be given to sole-authored papers based on original field, archival, and/or statistical research. However, thematic reviews that critically synthesize existing literature on a particular topic related to Vietnamese studies will also be considered.

The winner will receive a $500 prize and a one-year subscription to the Journal of Vietnamese Studies. We will also award two honourable mentions, each with a prize of $250. The winners will be notified in late Autumn 2023.

Papers may be written in English or Vietnamese. Submissions will be reviewed by a VSG sub-committee, which will evaluate the entries on the basis of their scholarly merit, theoretical and/or methodological originality, clarity, and style. Papers should also have implications that transcend their disciplinary boundaries to reach a broader academic audience. Only unpublished papers will be considered.

Submissions are due by 11:59 PM (BST) Friday September 29, 2023, to Sean Fear: S.Fear@leeds.ac.uk. The committee regrets that late submissions will not be accepted. In the email please attach (1) an anonymised PDF of the paper and (2) a letter of good standing from the applicant’s graduate department.

Additionally, it is a requirement that all submissions come from current (dues-paying) VSG members. The AAS secure online payment link to join VSG is:  https://members.asianstudies.org/committee-payments-donations. If you don’t already have an account, click on this link first and register one: https://members.asianstudies.org/account/login.aspx. People can make donations of any size; the recommended donation for student participants in VSG is $10. You will be provided an online receipt that you should send to the VSG Treasurer Richard Tran at rqtran@gmail.com.

VSG is a “study group” of the Association of Asian Studies, and its primary mission is to foster greater participation among Vietnam specialists in AAS and at the Annual Conference.

It is strongly desired, but not required, that students who have submitted a paper for consideration attend both the VSG meeting and the AAS conference (in-person or virtually if available). Graduate students are eligible to apply for additional AAS travel stipends and reduced conference fees

Please contact s.fear@leeds.ac.uk should you have any questions, and best of luck to all contestants!

In Memoriam: Nathan Sivin (1931-2022)

Photo of Professor Nathan Sivin, standing behind a sculpture of a cat mid-stride.

Nathan Sivin, Professor Emeritus of the History and Sociology of Science at the University of Pennsylvania, died on June 24, 2022 in Philadelphia at the age of 91. His wife of 58 years, Carole Delmore Sivin, a talented artist best known for her masks and ceramics, preceded him in death in December 2020. Many AAS members are among the friends, colleagues, and students who enjoyed their company over one-pot dinners, fine wines, and homemade ice cream in the Chestnut Hill home they shared for over forty years. The new Sivin Archive at the Penn libraries, comprised of all of his extant papers as well as her notebooks, sketchbooks, slides, and photo albums, offers a unique lens on the history of twentieth-century sinology. Furthermore, the Faculty of Humanities and Surasky Central Library at Tel Aviv University will integrate about 6,000 of his books into their system as the basis for a research lab on the history of science, medicine, and religion in China dedicated to his legacy.

Nathan Sivin grew up in West Virginia, where, by his own account, he received a bad education. Nevertheless, he was awarded a Pepsi-Cola scholarship designated for the top two students in his state (one male, one female). He first matriculated at M.I.T. as a chemistry major. Before his senior year, however, he took a leave of absence during the Korean War to join the Army. Later he enrolled in an 18-month Chinese language course at the Army Language School in California. When Sivin returned to M.I.T., he was among the first cohort to receive a B.S. in their new major of science and humanities. He then received his M.A. (1960) and his Ph.D. (1966) from Harvard University’s History of Science Department, writing the department’s first thesis on the history of science in China.

His first book, Chinese Alchemy: Preliminary Studies (Harvard University Press, 1968), was a study and translation of an alchemical text by the seventh-century literatus and healer Sun Simiao. Subsequent publications explored Chinese mathematical astronomy across almost the whole of imperial history, from the Han Dynasty through the Ming and Qing introduction of European methods and models. Later he explored Chinese religion and medicine just as broadly and deeply. Over the course of his career, Sivin published books (eighteen) and essays (more than seventy) on a diverse range of topics and periods. His contributions to the history of East Asian science, technology, medicine, philosophy, and religion earned him an international reputation and a lasting scholarly legacy.

Some of his most valuable contributions re-oriented whole domains of inquiry. For example, he contributed to Science and Civilisation in China, Joseph Needham’s magisterial project that explored China’s scientific heritage, but in his own essays he disagreed memorably with quite a few of Needham’s premises. He later republished those essays in the volumes Science in Ancient China (Variorum, 1995) and Medicine, Philosophy, and Religion in Ancient China (Variorum, 2005). In Traditional Medicine in Contemporary China (University of Michigan Center for Chinese Studies, 1987), his translation of a classical-medicine textbook from the PRC, Sivin laid out an agenda that inspired other scholars of healing in contemporary China. He asked whether the changes in classical Chinese medicine that had occurred since the late nineteenth century differed qualitatively from the changes that had taken place in earlier periods of Chinese history. In his view, they did; the system had lost coherence even in the eyes of its practitioners. The Way and the Word (Yale, 2002), co-authored with Geoffrey Lloyd, asked fundamental questions about what it means to compare science in different cultural contexts. It offered an audacious example, comparing ancient Greek and Chinese science embedded in their respective cultural manifolds over a span of six hundred years. Granting the Seasons (Springer, 2008) analyzed the calendar reform undertaken during the reign of Khubilai Khan in the late thirteenth century. Sivin viewed this as the most innovative change in an astronomical system in Chinese history, and explained the political, social, and intellectual factors that contributed to make it so. Finally, in Health Care in Eleventh-Century China (Springer, 2015), he applied the insights of medical anthropology to middle-period China, shifting the conventional focus away from elite physicians and toward the ritual and herbal healers who provided most of the health care.

Despite having a reputation as a contrarian adept at pointed critique, Sivin collaborated productively and generously with numerous colleagues. In addition to his work with Needham and with Lloyd, he shared a long scholarly friendship with Shigeru Nakayama, with whom he edited the second volume in MIT Press’s East Asian Science series, Chinese Science: Explorations of an Ancient Tradition (1973). He founded the journal Chinese Science and edited it for twenty years, helping to establish and expand the field. Chinese Science eventually became East Asian Science, Technology, and Medicine, the official journal of the International Society of the History of East Asian Science, Technology, and Medicine. Sivin was the society’s first president (1991-1993). For nearly twenty years a member and eventually the chairman of the board of the philanthropic organization East Asian History of Science, Inc., he helped raise funds to build the Needham Research Institute in Cambridge, England, and expand its valuable library. He was, in short, socially, institutionally, and intellectually central to developing into a formal discipline the history of science, technology, and medicine in East Asia.

Sivin began his career as an assistant professor at M.I.T. In the course of being promoted to full professor, he established the university’s Technology Studies program, now known as the Science, Technology, and Society Program. In 1977, he left M.I.T. for the University of Pennsylvania, where he spent the rest of his career, first in Chinese Studies and then in the Department of History and Sociology of Science, from which he officially retired in 2006. He accumulated many awards over the course of his long career, among them membership in the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and recognition as an honorary professor of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. The greatest accolade, however, may be an inadvertent one from a colleague who pejoratively referred to “the NFL: Nathan’s Female League,” which in fact acknowledges the many women scholars Sivin supported in countless ways—the three of us among them.

He leaves behind a host of grateful friends, colleagues, and students around the globe who will remember his wit, acumen, and generous editing; his love of good food, fine wine, and cats; and his commitment to both ideas and the people who have them.

— Submitted by Marta Hanson, Michael Nylan, and Hilary A. Smith

AsiaNow Speaks with Michael K. Bourdaghs

Michael K. Bourdaghs is Robert S. Ingersoll Professor in East Asian Languages and Civilizations, University of Chicago, and author of A Fictional Commons: Natsume Sōseki and the Properties of Modern Literature, published by Duke University Press and winner of the 2023 Honorable Mention, John Whitney Hall Prize.

To begin with, please tell us what your book is about.

My book rethinks the fiction and literary theories of Natsume Sōseki, often celebrated as Japan’s greatest modern novelist, as a kind of creative and critical response to the rise in Meiji Japan of the modern property regime, taken up as a legal system, a conceptual and scholarly problem, a framework for thinking about selfhood, and a set of everyday embodied practices. In more general terms, I try to explore in the book the ways literature as an intellectual and artistic pursuit engages productively and playfully with the dominant structures of modern society—including how it can provide a site for imagining alternative realities to the world in which we live. I pursue my argument through close readings of a large number of Sōseki’s works, readings that put them into dialogue with scholars and theorists from his day (William James, Marcel Mauss, and Motora Yūjirō for example) and from ours (Karatani Kōjin, Jacques Derrida, and C.B. Macpherson, among others).

What inspired you to research this topic?

The project is in a way my own attempt to answer the question, what is literature and what can it do? Sōseki seemed like an excellent instance for pursuing this. I’d always been interested in him as a writer. In fact, I wrote my senior thesis at Macalester College on Botchan. But I’d been a bit reluctant to pursue serious research on him: I was afraid that doing so might take one of the greatest pleasures in my life and turn it into work, something that I had to do. So I approached this project with some caution. I’m happy to report that at its conclusion, I find my passion for reading Sōseki intact.

I remember quite specifically the moment when the project came into clear focus in my mind, sometime around 1998 or 1999. I had been thinking about the intense engagement Sōseki had with the work of William James, and I came across a brief comment in Walter Benn Michael’s The Gold Standard and the Logic of Naturalism about James’s thought being an instance of what Macpherson calls “possessive individualism.” On the same afternoon, I was working on the translation I edited of Kamei Hideo’s Transformations of Sensibility: The Phenomenology of Meiji Literature and came across a passage that talked about how Meiji-era intellectuals in Japan used the development of a European-style private property system as a yardstick for measuring the degree of civilization attained by a given society. A lightbulb went on over my head as I connected those two passages to the fact that virtually all of Sōseki’s novels revolve directly or indirectly around property disputes. I also quickly realized that this also connected to his own basic ideas about what literature should be in both theory and practice.

What obstacles did you face in this project? What turned out better and/or easier than you expected it would?

The project took much, much longer than I’d anticipated at the start. I did the core research for the book at Tōhoku University, where Sōseki’s personal library is preserved, back in 2000-1, and at the time thought I’d finish the book in two or three years. It ended up taking twenty years. In part, this was because other projects intervened to distract me—among them a co-translation with Joseph Murphy, Atsuko Ueda and others of Sōseki’s remarkable literary criticism, including his 1907 Theory of Literature, an attempt to construct a fully scientific theory of literature that would be valid in all times and all places. I also got slowed down because in my mind the project expanded to include the problem of world literature, which is very relevant to Sōseki’s own attempt to theorize literature. I started mapping out chapters, for example, that would read his work in tandem with contemporary figures like Rabindranath Tagore, Gertrude Stein, and W.E.B. DuBois. I published some of that material in the form of articles, but in the end I decided to go back to my original conception for the book. Some of my ideas about Sōseki and world literature did get included in the book, though, mainly in the concluding chapter.  

What is the strangest/funniest/most outrageous/most interesting story or scrap of research you encountered in the course of working on this book?

The endnotes of my book are full of these surprising little anecdotes that I discovered along the way—that, for example, a wax cylinder recording of Sōseki’s voice was made but that the owner of the only copy loved listening to it so much that he played it obsessively until the grooves on the wax were completely worn down. Now the audio is completely lost, despite the recent efforts by scientists to recover the audio track from the cylinder using digital analysis. Or that Sōseki in London ended up living (in one of his residences) just a few blocks from where Sigmund Freud would settle in after fleeing from Vienna after the Nazi takeover three decades later. It supposedly became known as the J and J neighborhood: Japanese and Jews.

And in tackling Sōseki, one is always overwhelmed by the enormous amount of scholarship and criticism that has been done on him in Japan. In chapter three of the book, I take up the strange figure of a walking stick that the hero in To the Spring Equinox and Beyond receives as a gift. As I started to look into the previous scholarship on this, I was shocked to find that an entire book had been published on the topic of the walking sticks that show up in Sōseki’s novels. But maybe I shouldn’t have been surprised, after all.

What are the works that inspired you as you worked on this book, and/or what are some other titles that you recommend be read in tandem with your own?

Relatively late in my project, I came across Brenna Bhandar’s The Colonial Life of Properties: Law, Land, and Racial Regimes of Ownership (Duke University Press, 2018), which was enormously helpful in clarifying my own thoughts. And although it probably amounts to blowing my own horn a bit, Karatani Kōjin’s The Structure of World History: From Modes of Production to Modes of Exchange (Duke University Press, 2014), which I translated and is one of the side projects that delayed the publication of A Fictional Commons, was very useful. Finally, I’d mention the delights I discovered in going over Sōseki’s own marginal comments and underlinings from the books in his personal library: he left behind the record of a careful and sometimes snarky reader.

Finally, what has captured your attention lately—as a reader, writer, scholar, professor, or person living in the world?

I’m inspired by the wave of recent scholarship that is reminding us of Japan’s deep connections to the rest of Asia, connections that remained vital even after 1945, as well as by the recent flood of new scholarship and translations that are finally letting us see the crucial importance of leftist political activism and thought in modern Japan. My current project is a study of Cold War culture in Japan that tries to show how Japan after 1945 was an active participant in all three of the “worlds” of the Cold War order—the First World of the liberal capitalist countries, the Second World of the socialist bloc, and the Third World of the decolonization and nonaligned movements. I hope it will contribute to these new and important directions in scholarship on Japan.

ACLS Statement on SCOTUS Ruling on Affirmative Action

Published at the American Council of Learned Societies website: July 5, 2023

Last week, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) ruled race-conscious admissions programs at colleges and universities to be unlawful, thus rejecting widely accepted practices meant to encourage diversity that have been part of US higher education for more than fifty years.

The American Council of Learned Societies stands firm in our belief in the value of diversity at all levels of higher education. The active participation of diverse people in the scholarly enterprise is the best way to combat historic and systemic inequities. It is the best way to ensure that scholars represent the world’s rich diversity of communities and cultures. It is the best way—the proven way—to address past erasures in scholarship. Diverse scholarly perspectives advance our collective efforts as a society to understand our past and present and to make informed decisions about our future.

As an organization whose membership includes a Research University Consortium of 44 of our country’s most highly selective institutions of higher education, we want to call attention to the impact of this decision on the production and circulation of knowledge in colleges and universities. If undergraduate communities are less diverse, graduate schools and the future professoriate will also be less diverse. As the range of future scholars and teachers narrows, so will our scholarly perspective, and students—and all of us who benefit from learning—will suffer. 

ACLS remains committed to continuing to support and celebrate scholars, administrators, scholarship, and institutions that contribute to a more just and equitable academy now and for generations to come.

Our commitment includes fellowship and grant programs strategically designed to support diversity and equity in the academy. This includes programs targeted to historically under-funded institutions such as Historically Black Colleges and Universities, as well as fellowships for scholars who have traditionally had less access to external research support and scholarly resources, including first-generation scholars and those from marginalized communities. We will continue our work in making these opportunities accessible to scholars working across the expanding landscape of humanistic fields of study in and beyond the academy.

In partnership with academic societies, scholars, administrators, supporters, and peer organizations, we seek better ways to recruit and retain a diverse community of scholars across all fields of study and to serve a more diverse professoriate. We will continue our collective effort to ignite and advance systemic change within the academy. We look forward to collaborating with all these groups in exploring additional methods to sustain diversity related to socioeconomic class as well as race and gender. 

We believe this work is essential to fulfilling our mission to support the creation and circulation of knowledge for the public good. We encourage all our member institutions to join us.

The following ACLS member societies and institutions have affirmed their support for this statement:

African Studies Association
American Academy of Religion
American Association for Italian Studies
American Folklore Society
American Historical Association
American Philosophical Association
American Political Science Association
American Society for Environmental History
American Society for Theatre Research
Association for Asian Studies
Association for Jewish Studies
Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies
Association for the Study of African American Life and History
Association of University Presses
College Art Association
Dance Studies Association
German Studies Association
International Center of Medieval Art
Medieval Academy of America
National Communication Association
National Council on Public History
National Women’s Studies Association
North American Conference on British Studies
Oral History Association
Organization of American Historians
Rhetoric Society of America
Shakespeare Association of America
Society for Cinema and Media Studies
Society for Ethnomusicology
Society for Social Studies of Science
Society of Architectural Historians
Society of Biblical Literature

AsiaNow Speaks with Aurelia Campbell

Aurelia Campbell is Associate Professor at Boston College and author of What the Emperor Built: Architecture and Empire in the Early Ming, published by University of Washington Press and winner of the 2023 AAS Bei Shan Tang Monograph Prize.

To begin with, please tell us what your book is about.

My book is about the architectural projects of third emperor of the Ming dynasty, Zhu Di, who ruled as the Yongle emperor from 1402-1424. Yongle was prolific builder and, fortunately, many of the buildings from his reign survive today. Examining how and why the buildings were constructed, I argue that Yongle’s architectural projects were key components in his approach to emperorship, his sense of empire, and his imperial legacy. 

What inspired you to research this topic?

The inspiration for this project actually began while I was still a PhD student at the University of Pennsylvania. I came to Penn to study Chinese architecture. As a student, I noticed that even though an abundance of Ming dynasty architecture survives, scholarship on it had been significantly neglected in contrast to that on architecture of earlier periods in China. Therefore, I decided to write my dissertation on something related to the Ming. While preparing for my comprehensive examinations, I read as much as I could on the topic and, in the process, noticed that some of the most remarkable surviving Ming buildings had been commissioned by the Yongle emperor. This included a hall made out of metal on the highest peak of the Daoist Mount Wudang in Hubei and an imperial style architectural complex at a Buddhist monastery in Qinghai, at the Sino-Tibetan frontier. Yongle had also commissioned two of the most well-known sites in premodern Chinese architectural history: the Porcelain Pagoda in Nanjing and the Forbidden City in Beijing. Unfortunately, the pagoda was destroyed during the Taiping rebellion and, although the imperial palace still exists, the majority of the Yongle-era buildings were reconstructed over the course of the Ming and Qing dynasties. Nonetheless, given the great deal of interesting-sounding architecture Yongle commissioned, I felt that there might be a good story to tell. Although I wrote my dissertation on just one site (Qutan Monastery in Qinghai), it was clear that in order to convey the complete picture of Yongle’s architectural ambitions, I eventually would need to investigate his building projects as a whole.

What obstacles did you face in this project? What turned out better and/or easier than you expected it would?

Because Yongle built so expansively, the fieldwork for this project was oftentimes exhausting. Between 2009 and 2017 I made seven research trips to China. During these trips, I traveled to sites in far-flung regions multiple times to make sure that I understood the buildings well enough to write about them. Now that I’m older, I’m not sure I would be able to do that kind of research again! But truth be told, the most difficult and frustrating part of the process happened after I finished the book: securing the permissions for all the images I published, which took months. To meet the high standards of the University of Washington Press, I also had to hire a professional illustrator to redraw dozens of the architectural line drawings—another very time consuming process that was particularly stressful given that I was working under a tight deadline. In terms of what was easier than expected, perhaps surprisingly, the archival research. I was lucky to be accepted into three-week long workshop at the Max Planck Institute in Berlin to test out a new digital tool they were developing that allows you to easily search key terms across hundreds of local gazetteers (difangzhi 地方志). This tool was invaluable for locating information on the Ming and Qing court’s use of nanmu as a construction material. The findings from that workshop made up much of the second chapter of my book.

What is the strangest/funniest/most outrageous/most interesting story or scrap of research you encountered in the course of working on this book?

Yongle was such a fascinating character that some of the most interesting aspects of my research involved trying to understand his psychology. It is well known that Yongle usurped the throne from this nephew, whom he killed in the process. After spending several years reading about Yongle, it was apparent just how deeply his past haunted him. It was almost comical how far Yongle and his sycophantic officials would go to spin every event in his favor while still feigning modesty. For instance, when a large nanmu tree fell on its own in the forest, Yongle’s officials saw it as a sign that Heaven had offered the timber up for the imperial construction projects on account of the emperor’s great virtue. But Yongle did not want to take credit for it and instead attributed it to mountain spirits. A huge deal was made of the “miraculous” event: Yongle ordered an inscription to be composed by a high official documenting it in hyperbolic terms, and it was retold in several different textual sources. Likewise, when the architectural complex at Mount Wudang, created for the Daoist deity Zhenwu, was completed, Yongle dispatched officials to the mountain to record in words and images all the miraculous occurrences that had taken place. They documented some pretty fantastical scenes of rainbow light and even the deity himself emerging from the clouds with his retinue. Of course, all of these outrageous anecdotes made the book much more fun to write.  

What are the works that inspired you as you worked on this book, and/or what are some other titles that you recommend be read in tandem with your own?

So many books were inspirational in my research! But the following books stand out as being particularly useful in shaping my approach: Hok-lam Chan’s Legends of Building Old Peking (University of Washington Press, 2008); Patricia Berger’s Empire of Emptiness: Buddhist Art and Political Authority in Qing China (University of Hawai’i Press, 2003); William Coaldrake’s Architecture and Authority in Japan (Routledge, 1996); Craig Clunas’s Empire of Great Brightness: Visual and Material Cultures of Ming China (University of Hawai’i Press, 2007); and Timothy Brook’s The Troubled Empire: China in the Yuan and Ming Dynasties (Harvard University Press, 2010). Although it was published after my book, Making the Palace Machine Work: Mobilizing People, Objects, and Nature in the Qing Empire, edited by Martina Siebert, Kai Jun Chen, and Dorothy Ko (Amsterdam University Press, 2021) complements my book quite nicely.

Finally, what has captured your attention lately—as a reader, writer, scholar, professor, or person living in the world?

I’m currently turning my academic attention away from the imperial and expansive and towards places of a more intimate scale: individuals’ tombs, specifically in the Ming dynasty. The Ming has been significantly overlooked in art historical scholarship on tombs, which tends to terminate in the Yuan, leaving a lacuna about what happened afterwards. Yet hundreds of tombs from the Ming have been excavated and they yield quite extraordinary material finds. Moreover, Ming tombs present an interesting problem in that they are more simplified with regard to tomb design and decoration than earlier tombs. In the Ming, you rarely find painted or sculpted decoration mimicking aboveground architecture, as was common in earlier periods. Why was this the case? I’m fascinated by what the artifacts selected to accompany people in death can tell us about how people lived, what they valued, and even what they believed in terms of their conceptions of life after death. I’m enjoying the research process, but the challenge will try trying to see the tombs and objects in person one day.

Call for Papers — The Presence of the Public in Southeast Asian Studies: Epistemologies and Experiences

The Southeast Asia Council (SEAC) of the Association for Asian Studies (AAS) is seeking paper proposals from up-and-coming scholars – including graduate students – to join a “JSEAS-SEAC” panel on the topic of “The Presence of the Public in Southeast Asian Studies: Epistemologies and Experiences” (Click button below for eligibility). We seek to recruit early career scholars from Southeast Asian countries to form a panel for inclusion in the 2024 Annual Conference of the Association for Asian Studies, to be held in Seattle from March 16-19, 2023. Presenters will receive partial financial assistance to attend the meetings by Journal of Southeast Asian Studies.

Application deadline: July 15, 2023


Ford and My Family

Ford Motor Company headquarters building in Dearborn, Michigan.
Ford Motor Company Headquarters in Dearborn, Michigan. Source: Wikipedia

By Katherine In-Young Lee

Katherine In-Young Lee is associate professor of ethnomusicology at the University of California, Los Angeles. In the essay “Ford and My Family,” available for download at the button below, Lee begins with a moment from her childhood in Canton, Michigan, where she grew up in an environment marked by “a special brand of racism that was directed toward Asians and Asian Americans in 1980s metropolitan Detroit.” With Japanese auto companies threatening Detroit’s biggest industry, Michigan workers targeted drivers of those vehicles: “Tires might be slashed, doors could be keyed, or windows smashed.” On June 19, 1982, autoworkers Ronald Ebens and Michael Nitz turned their vitriol on Vincent Chin, not caring that Chin was Chinese American or that he in fact worked for a Detroit-based auto supplier. Ebens and Nitz beat Chin to death, a tragic story recounted in the documentary Who Killed Vincent Chin?

Lee’s father spent three decades as a Ford employee, and the family purchased a succession of the company’s products. Having survived the uncertainty of the Korean War and immigration to the United States, her parents enjoyed the stability offered by Ford employment. The scarcity of a Korean community in Southeast Michigan was a trade-off, “run-of-the-mill anti-Asian racism” an occasional reminder of their outsider status. Their cars signified that the family belonged. “By buying and driving only Ford vehicles,” she writes, “we were making a pointed statement: we have invested in America.”

Lee’s father accepted a buyout from Ford in 2005 (and is currently recovering from a serious stroke), but her family’s loyalty to the brand remains. The company again faces an uncertain future, with restructuring and layoffs echoing the tough times of the 1980s:

This is an all too familiar cycle unfolding in the state of Michigan. It makes me wonder how this latest blow will reverberate in Detroit, a city that declared bankruptcy in 2013. Will the blame be placed on the robots who obviate the need for human labor (and salaries with benefits)? Or will the blame be placed on other companies currently outperforming Ford in the energy-efficient vehicle market? If that is the case, will a company like Tesla receive any shade since it’s at the top of the electric vehicle market? Or will there somehow be a new way to spin anti-Asian rhetoric in this car-conscious city as the COVID-19 pandemic persists?

Lee’s reflections on family history, identity, and community come together in this essay, which we are pleased to share with #AsiaNow readers.


“Ford and My Family,” © Katherine In-Young Lee, originally published May 2023 in CUNY FORUM 10:1 and reposted here with permission.

Call for Papers: Urban Inequality and Rights to the City in Southeast Asia

Rising Voices in Southeast Asian Studies — SEAC/AAS Initiative

Association for Asian Studies 2024 Annual Conference (AAS2024 @ Seattle)

Submission deadline: July 15, 2023

The Southeast Asia Council (SEAC) of the Association for Asian Studies (AAS) is seeking paper proposals from up-and-coming scholars – including graduate students – to join a “Rising Voices” panel on the topic of “Urban Inequality and Rights to the City in Southeast Asia” (See below for eligibility). We seek to recruit early career scholars from Southeast Asian countries to form a panel for inclusion in the 2024 Annual Conference of the Association for Asian Studies, to be held in Seattle from March 14-17, 2024. SEAC will provide partial financial assistance for presenters to attend the meetings. In addition to receiving financial support from the AAS/SEAC, this year’s Rising Voices Panel also has financial support provided by TRaNS: Trans-Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia.

Panel Topic Description

Warfare, global epidemics, democratic declines, militarization, and (neo)liberalization of economies have adversely affected the rights of ordinary people in Southeast Asian cities across time and space. Differential access to public services and to land tenure security have jeopardized livelihoods and created new forms of urban precarity.  This panel will examine debates over urban inequality and the right to flourish in the city, that is, to inhabit and enjoy inclusive and sustainable urban development that prioritize people over profit. This right hinges on the ability to refuse accumulation through dispossession and extraction, while demanding universal access to urban resources, including infrastructure, health care, and a non-toxic environment. Panelists are encouraged to approach the topic through an historical and/or contemporary ethnographic lens that provides both empirical and theorical insights. Interdisciplinary methodologies are encouraged. Proposals may choose to focus on a singular Southeast Asian city or to conduct a comparative urban analysis across the region.  

Some questions the panel may consider include:

  1. What factors have contributed to an increase in urban social, environmental, infrastructural, material, and health inequalities in recent years, and how has this rise in inequality impacted people’s rights to the city?
  2. To what extent have recent political and economic changes in Southeast Asia (e.g., return to military rule or adoption of neoliberal policies) exacerbated inequality and created new forms of precarity in the city?
  3. Are there identifiable regional trends or comparative patterns across nation-states affecting the rights of vulnerable populations in Southeast Asian cities?
  4. How have technical solutions—such as infrastructure design and development—mitigated and/or reproduced racial and gender disparities in the city and compromised people’s rights to access public goods and services, like housing?
  5. What have vulnerable populations done to advance their rights in Southeast Asian cities in the face of privatization and loss of their livelihoods and/or inclusive urban spaces accessible to all persons?
  6. How have civil society and political organizations responded to the worsening rights situation of the urban poor and marginalized populations? What alternative visions for a more just urban future have they put forth? In what ways have they been successful? In what ways have they fallen short of their goals?


Eligibility and Selection Criteria

We seek papers by Southeast Asian scholars who are early career scholars, or “rising voices.” Rising voices are defined here as advanced graduate students (currently writing dissertations based on original field or archival research) or untenured faculty members (including tenure-track assistant professors, adjuncts, and lecturers, or the approximate equivalent based on the academic tradition from which the scholar is coming). Applicants may be currently enrolled as students in, or employed by, any institution of higher education in the world. However, preference may be given to students or faculty currently based at underfunded institutions in non-high-income (and non-OCED) countries in Southeast Asia, as per AAS guidelines.

In addition to the stated goal of supporting rising voices from Southeast Asia, the primary criteria for selection will be the quality and cohesiveness of the proposals to form a viable panel. Please note that neither published papers nor papers under review can be accepted to Rising Voices. The panel is intended to be a Southeast Asia-focused panel. Submissions that do not substantively address issues pertaining to the region will not be considered. The selected panelists will be expected to attend the conference in person and comply with the deadline for paper submissions.

To submit a paper proposal, please provide the following items in the order listed below, all within a SINGLE Microsoft Word file or PDF document, by July 15, 2023:

a. Applicant’s Name, affiliation, and contact information, clearly indicating applicant’s current country of residence.

b. Paper abstract. 250 words in the format of the standard AAS paper proposal.

c. Brief bio-sketch of 200 words describing current and recent scholarly positions, a brief sentence or two about current research, and any significant publications. The model for this should be the standard blurb one sees on a faculty or student website.

d. Current curriculum vitae. Maximum 4 pages.

Please save the file with the following filename: RisingVoices2024_ApplicantsFamilyName.pdf

Completed applications should be sent to the attention of Dr. Christina Schwenkel (cschwenk@ucr.edu) and Dr. Mitch Aso by the July 15, 2023 deadline. Late submissions or submissions that do not follow the above instructions will not be considered. Applicants should confirm in their email that their paper has not been published or submitted for review elsewhere. 

In Memoriam: Lyman P. Van Slyke

Photo of Lyman P. Van Slyke standing at a podium against a black wall.
Lyman P. Van Slyke accepting the 2016 AAS Distinguished Contributions to Asian Studies award in Seattle, Washington.

Lyman P. Van Slyke—known as “Van” to his friends and colleagues— grew up in a small mining town in northern Minnesota and graduated from Carleton College in 1950. He enlisted in the U.S. Navy and was assigned as a naval air intelligence officer on the aircraft carrier Valley Forge during the Korean War. When his ship was not engaged in combat missions, he visited Korea, Japan, Hong Kong, and the Philippines. This exposure led him to pursue Asian Studies, and he entered graduate school at the University of California, Berkeley in 1955. His advisor Joseph Levenson grounded him in rigorous research and collegial debate, and he gained a mastery of Chinese language, including two years of study in Taiwan.

With this Ph.D. in hand, Van Slyke joined Stanford University’s faculty in 1963. His arrival coincided with the founding of the Inter-University Program for Chinese Language Studies (IUP) in Taipei, a consortium known as the Stanford Center, which became the pre-eminent program for intermediate to advanced training for American graduate students. He served as the IUP’s executive secretary for more than three decades, and was instrumental in raising funds for the IUP’s relocation from National Taiwan University to Tsinghua University in Beijing in 1997.

Van Slyke’s research focused on Republican China as well as United States-China relations in the twentieth century. His first book, Enemies and Friends: The United Front in Chinese Communist History (Stanford, 1967), delved into the importance of flexible political alliances during Mao’s quest for power. He showed how winning over friends and neutralizing enemies evolved from “tactic to strategy to ideology.” John Fairbank praised the book for its clarity and sophistication and its advancement of study of the Chinese Communist Party.

History mattered for Van Slyke because he believed it held lessons for the present. In the late 1960s when Americans were calling for a reevaluation of U.S. policy opposing diplomatic recognition of the PRC, he edited and wrote new introductions for reprints of two essential U.S. Government documents from the 1940s: The Chinese Communist Movement, a War Department report issued in 1945, and The China White Paper, the State Department’s seminal 1949 history of U.S. relations with China, helping to sweep away historical distortions of anti-communist ideologues.

Tobie Meyer-Fong, Terry Lautz, Lyman P. Van Slyke, and Roger Thompson at the AAS 2016 Annual Conference in Seattle, Washington. Photo courtesy of Terry Lautz.

Together with Harold Kahn, his longtime Stanford colleague who was a specialist in traditional Chinese history, they mentored generations of students who went on to distinguished academic careers at colleges and universities across the United States and in Asia.

Van Slyke’s undergraduate survey courses on modern China and U.S.-China relations were among the most popular classes at Stanford. Serving as the first director of Stanford’s interdisciplinary East Asian Studies MA program, he recognized the need for substantive knowledge of China, Japan, and other areas of Asia in professions beyond academia. A number of his students would take up leadership roles in government, education, journalism, nonprofit organizations, philanthropy, and business.

Van Slyke regularly spoke to civic groups, service clubs and adult learning forums, and led thirty-five Stanford Alumni Association study tours to China. He reached wider audiences with the publication of Yangtze in 1988.  The San Francisco Chronicle wrote, “Reading Yangtze: Nature, History and the River, indeed, is rather like taking a real river journey in the company of an expert and literate guide.”

A modern-day Confucian generalist, he combined knowledge of a vast array of things Chinese to bring its culture and history to life. He embraced the opportunities presented to him to become a leading scholar of twentieth-century China, a builder of critical infrastructure for Chinese language training, and the mentor of a cadre of well-prepared acolytes.

His contribution was not a new school of thought, but of women and men dedicated to the same human-kindness (仁 ren), intellectual inquisitiveness, and collegial examination of issues that produces friendships as well as professional and intellectual advances. He received the AAS Award for Distinguished Contributions to Asian Studies in 2016 for his impact on generations of scholars, both in the U.S. and in Asia, and for his work to increase public understanding of China.

Van Slyke’s modesty was evident in his response to the AAS award. He noted that his students had become valued colleagues, peers, and friends—esteemed mentors in their own right. He went on to refer to the Chinese idiom Qing chu yu lan 青出於藍—literally “deeper blue than the indigo plant from which it comes.” He explained it has “the understood meaning of students who surpass their teachers.”  And this, he said, “is as it should be—students SHOULD surpass their teachers.”

Lyman Van Slyke’s legacy is people who forged new paths in studying, educating, and engaging with China. What greater achievement can there be than pupils who magnify the brilliance of their sage?

— Submitted by Michael Ipson and Terry Lautz

Call for Applications: 2023-2024 Cultivating the Humanities and Social Sciences Research Grants

The Association for Asian Studies is now accepting applications for its 2023-2024 Cultivating the Humanities and Social Sciences (CHSS) Research Grants.

The Cultivating the Humanities and Social Sciences Research Grants are made possible thanks to the generous support of Sweden. This grant program is part of a collaborative transnational project that aims at enhancing the research capabilities of scholars and local institutions, especially in post-conflict and conflict areas, while helping to reduce the social and economic vulnerabilities of South and Southeast Asian countries through policy-relevant research.

The project focuses on junior faculty, graduate students, senior and independent scholars, women, and ethnic minority groups in particular. Cultivating the Humanities and Social Sciences Research Grants are available for short- (up to 2 months), medium- (2-6 months), and long-term (12 months) research projects that advance the fields of the humanities and social sciences in South and Southeast Asia.

The Association for Asian Studies invites applications from low- and lower middle-income countries of Southeast Asia (e.g., Cambodia, Lao PDR, Myanmar, Timor-Leste, Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam) as well as from less economically advantaged countries and areas of South Asia (e.g., Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Pakistan, Nepal, Sri Lanka, and India). When evaluating proposals from Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, and India, the review committee will prioritize applicants who come from regions and/or institutions with resource and infrastructure constraints. Applications from the Maldives will also be considered.

We also encourage collaborative projects, especially those that partner scholars from under-resourced institutions with colleagues at institutions that offer more resources and infrastructure to support their work.

Recipients of CHSS grants will be invited to submit a panel proposal at an AAS-in-Asia conference, where they will have the opportunity to share the results of their research projects, participate in skill-building workshops, and discuss publishing prospects with our partners based in Asia, Europe, and the U.S.

Who Is Eligible?

  • Graduate students (both MA and Ph.D.), junior scholars, and senior scholars are eligible and welcome to apply.
  • Under-represented constituents of the transnational Asian Studies community, or those from or living in post-conflict areas or in areas where conflicts are ongoing.
  • People living in low and lower-middle income areas of South and Southeast Asia.
  • Masters’ students who may not be able to continue on a Ph.D. track due to circumstances beyond their control are also encouraged to apply.
  • AAS membership is not a requirement.

Program Overview

The CHSS grant program encourages both individual and group projects (such as those bringing senior and junior scholars together) that will explore the subjects of i) development, ii) democracy, iii) human rights, iv) gender, v) the environment, and vi) forest conservation in the Philippines (see below). These themes may be researched on their own, or in combination with one another, or in ways that cut across the humanities and social sciences. Preference will be given to applicants who have never received a research grant in the past and/or who are based in an under-resourced institution.

The program also welcomes proposals for special initiatives aim at the recording, preservation, and dissemination of endangered languages, oral histories, and traditional knowledge.

The Forest Foundation Philippines is a non-profit organization that provides grants and technical assistance to organizations and individuals that empower the people to protect the forests. A special funding through its small grants program will be made available by the Forest Foundation Philippines to Filipino scholars with projects related to forest conservation and restoration, forest communities and sustainable livelihoods, indigenous knowledge systems, forest policy and governance, (counter)mapping forest landscapes, and other approaches that foster knowledge co-creation and transdisciplinary knowledge-making in any discipline of humanities and social sciences. Under-represented scholars, including indigenous scholars, women, and early-career researchers, especially from Palawan, Sierra Madre, Samar and Leyte, and Bukidnon and Misamis Oriental, are invited to apply. For more information about the programs of the Forest Foundation Philippines, visit their website at www.forestfoundation.ph.  

CHSS grants typically range from $2,000 for a short-term project to $12,000 for long-term.

The grants will be awarded with the understanding that within two years of completion of their project, the recipients will present the results of their research at an AAS-in-Asia conference, or a similar international conference, with acknowledgement of the award. Any publication based on the funded research should also acknowledge the AAS-Sweden Cultivating the Humanities and Social Sciences Research Grants or the Forest Foundation Philippines.

What Funding May Be Used For

  • Research essential for postdoctoral scholars and PhD and Master’s students theses, dissertation, and/or book projects, or for manuscript revisions and journal articles in the humanities and social sciences.
  • Small scholarly seminars and pedagogical workshops.
  • Translation, curriculum development, and textbooks projects.
  • Documentary films and visual arts projects.

What Funding May Not Be Used For

  • Travel and accommodation expenses to attend a professional conference.
  • The funding may not be used in conjunction with another research grant.

How to Apply

All applications must be submitted through the AAS application portal by September 1, 2023. Your application should include:

  • A cover letter outlining: 1) how the research grant will be used; 2) how it will contribute to the applicant’s professional development and academic career; 3) how this will contribute to the field of South or Southeast Asian studies in general; 4) how this project or applicant is related to low-income or less economically advantaged regions of South or Southeast Asia.
  • A two-page curriculum vitae, as well as the curriculum vitae of any team members or co-primary investigators (if applicable).
  • A proposal of 800-1,000 words (including footnotes) on the research project
  • A budget, detailing anticipated project expenses.
  • A timeline for the project.
  • A sample of the applicant’s work. (No minimum length, but ideally 2,000 – 2,500 words)
  • One recommendation letter by a referee who is familiar with the applicant’s field of research. Preference will be given to applicants who have never received a research grant in the past and/or who are based in an under-resourced institution. Each applicant must request that the letters be submitted via the online portal by September 1, 2023. Please contact the Grants Manager at grants@asianstudies.org if any difficulties arise on this step.

Applicants will be notified in December 2023 of funding decisions.


In Memoriam: John MacDougall

John MacDougall, a pioneer of using the Internet as a research tool for Indonesian studies, died in Maryland on May 16, aged 83.

Among his many services, he was editor and publisher of Indonesia Publications from 1984 to 2004; creator and moderator of a bilingual Indonesian and English “Apakabar Project” from 1990 to 2002 which attracted 250,000 readers from 96 countries; creator of several research sites on Indonesia, Southeast Asia and the Islamic World, including http://www.indopubs.com and https://starting-points.blogspot.com.

A native of New Jersey, he was a brilliant student. In graduate school at Harvard, John focused on social psychology and taught courses on American race and labor relations, just as the civil rights and anti-Vietnam War movements were reaching a crescendo. These movements left John with a belief that civil society advocacy was a path to political and social reform, a belief that stayed with him until the end.

He taught at the National University of Singapore, Cornell, the University of Alabama at Huntsville (where he chaired the Department of Sociology), and other universities before joining the U.S. government as a Southeast Asia specialist from 1977 to 1984. It was in 1984 that he decided to strike out on his own as a chronicler of Indonesia and became an invaluable friend and resource to generations of Indonesian and others working on Southeast Asia worldwide.

John used the online bulletin “Inside Indonesia” to publish many of his lists of useful websites by theme: “Justice on the Net”, “Labour on the Net”, “Aceh on the Net”, “Sulawesi on the Net” and so on. Most of these appeared in 2004, 2005, and 2006.

Most of John’s thousands of online friends never met him. He worked quietly out of his home, shunning self-publicity, accolades, or any public expressions of gratitude from the many Indonesians and non-Indonesians he helped. He did more for Indonesian studies over the years than many much better-known figures. He was an early fan of Facebook but became one of those quickly disillusioned by issues of invasion of privacy for profit. The explosion of social media and search sites meant that much of John’s pioneering work has not always received the recognition it deserves.

For anyone researching the end of the New Order, however, John’s archives remain invaluable. And as a champion of justice and human rights, he will always be a model of how to use information for anti-authoritarian ends.

John leaves his wife of 52 years Sock Foon MacDougall, a sociologist with current interest in human trafficking and indigenous peoples; a brother, Terry MacDougall, emeritus director and professor of the Stanford Japan Center, and a sister, Diane Stephenson, a retired elementary school teacher.

— Submitted by Sidney Jones

AAS Board of Directors – March 2023 Meeting Summary for Members

The AAS Board of Directors (BOD) assembled for its spring meeting in Boston, Massachusetts on March 15. After ratifying the minutes from its January 2023 meeting, the BOD discussed an array of Association matters and took action on several of them, including the following:

  • The “non-OECD” membership category name, which did not capture the complete list of countries eligible for this rate, will be changed to “Low-income/low-middle-income countries,” in accordance with World Bank designations for the same.
  • In mid-2023, the price of a lifetime membership will increase from $2,000 to $2,500.
  • The Board approved a proposed change to the Bylaws, which will reduce the number of nominees required for each Council of Conferences member organization in the AAS elections. Currently, COC members must submit “at least 3” nominees; this change (which will be voted on by the full AAS membership in fall 2023) will amend that language to “1-3” candidates.
  • The Graduate Education and Training in Southeast Asian Studies (GETSEA) consortium is approved as an affiliate organization of the AAS.

In addition to voting on the motions above, the BOD engaged in various discussions throughout the day about areas in which the AAS could explore new directions or intensify the work already underway. These discussions focused on aligning new or existing programs with the five overarching goals of the Strategic Plan AAS issued in 2022:

1. Grow AAS engagement in Asia

The AAS-in-Asia conference has been an important launchpad for AAS activities in Asia, which continue to expand. Prior to the 2023 conference in Daegu, Korea, AAS and Ewha Womens University will hold a symposium for grantees from our Cultivating the Humanities and Social Sciences initiative, and Kyungpook National University will host a workshop for junior scholars aimed at promoting the publication of research articles in international journals. The Board also decided to offer a discount on new AAS memberships to Asia-based scholars attending AAS-in-Asia.

2. Grow new and maintain existing membership

The Board discussed ideas about how to make education and pedagogy more visible parts of AAS programming. In addition to its previous decision to create a K-12 educator membership category, the BOD seeks to offer more mentorship or workshop opportunities related to teaching, and to further strengthen the Education About Asia teaching journal through support from the SIDA grant awarded to the AAS in 2022.

3. Enact AAS’ ongoing commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)

The BOD reaffirmed its commitment to holding a virtual component of the Annual Conference, recognizing its importance to scholars for whom attending the in-person conference is not feasible. The AAS will also explore options for future in-person conference locations that will be more affordable for both the organization and its members, given that hotel and event costs in many larger cities have risen considerably in recent years.

4. Grow and maintain financial sustainability

AAS Executive Director Hilary Finchum-Sung and Director of Special Initiatives Krisna Uk are engaged in ongoing efforts to secure grants that will sustain AAS activities. The BOD also endorsed a suggestion that the organization increase its fundraising activities, and explore the possibility of a focused fundraising campaign. Over the past several years, both the AAS Secretariat and the Finance Committee have worked hard to refine the Association’s accounting, budgeting, and investment practices in the interest of controlling costs and ensuring financial sustainability for the organization.

5. Enhance administrative efficiency and effectiveness

The Board recognized the amount of work carried out by the small AAS Secretariat staff and frequently referenced the need to balance the desire for more programming with an awareness of the workload this would place on the staff. In early 2023, Arlo Johnston joined the Secretariat as a half-time Program Support Specialist, and they have taken on some of the administrative duties that keep the Secretariat running smoothly. Students employed through the AAS Internship Program also play key support roles, particularly in their work on the Education About Asia full-text archive, which is nearly complete.

Call for Proposals: Southeast Asia Council Designated Panels

Association for Asian Studies Annual Conference 2024

Submission deadline: July 15, 2023

The Southeast Asia Council (SEAC) of the Association for Asian Studies (AAS) is seeking a panel or roundtable proposal for SEAC designated panels. 

Each year SEAC is allocated two Designated Panels, which are accepted directly onto the Annual Conference Program without Program Committee review or approval. 

The SEAC Designated Panels should reflect current developments in the field of Southeast Asian Studies, or address areas the Council feels require greater attention from Southeast Asianists, or Asian Studies more broadly. SEAC Designated Panels receive $1,000 in support from the annual AAS subvention to SEAC. Preference is given to cross-country studies and/or multi-disciplinary studies. If you are working on a country-specific panel or roundtable, please consider applying for a SEAC country group designated panel. 

Please provide a working title, the name of the prospective organizer(s), a panel title and abstract (250 words), paper titles and abstracts (250 words per paper). Please follow the format of the standard AAS panel or roundtable proposal. Completed applications should be sent to the attention of Dr. Eunsook Jung to the following address: esjung@wisc.edu by the 15 July 2023 deadline. Late submissions will not be considered.

The panel is intended to be a Southeast Asia-focused panel. Submissions that do not substantively address issues pertaining to the region will not be considered.

2023-24 Gosling-Lim Postdoctoral Fellowship Awarded to Dr. Nor Ismah

The Association for Asian Studies is pleased to announce that the 2023 Gosling-Lim Postdoctoral Fellowship in Southeast Asian Studies has been awarded to Dr. Nor Ismah, Vice-Director at the Institute of Southeast Asian Islam at Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Dr. Ismah will be based at the Center for Southeast Asian Studies at the University of Michigan, where she will spend the 2023-24 academic year revising her dissertation project, “Women Issuing Fatwas: Female Islamic Scholars and Community-Based Authority in Java, Indonesia,” into a book manuscript.

Dr. Ismah has studied at Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University (B.A., 2002), the University of Hawaii, Manoa (M.A., 2012), and Leiden University (Ph.D., 2023). In addition to her academic scholarship, she has published two novels and is currently working on a third. Author of more than a dozen journal articles and book chapters, Dr. Ismah’s work has been supported by funding from the Ford Foundation, Australia Awards Indonesia, and the United States Department of State Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, among many other organizations. She has extensive experience working as a writer and editor, researcher, and facilitator for a variety of educational training programs.

The Gosling-Lim Postdoctoral Fellow in Southeast Asian Studies was established in 2022 thanks to a generous gift from L.A. Peter Gosling and Linda Yuen-Ching Lim. This fellowship is focused on capability-building in Southeast Asian Studies among scholars who are Southeast Asian nationals based in Southeast Asia and at Southeast Asian institutions. Its goal is to enable such scholars to concentrate on publishing their dissertation research, and/or embark on new post-dissertation research, without the distraction of having to teach, consult, or shoulder administrative burdens, and with the opportunity to expand their scholarly networks and expertise. The intent is that fellowship recipients will develop their careers in the region, helping to advance the field of Southeast Asian Studies within the region.

The Association for Asian Studies looks forward to welcoming Dr. Nor Ismah to Ann Arbor later this year.

Member Spotlight: Chelsea Davidson

Chelsea Davidson is an ESL tutor who teaches independently under her brand, Birdie English. A new AAS member—she joined the association on March 3, 2023—Davidson is broadly interested in Asian Studies, English Language Education/Applied Linguistics, and Interdisciplinary Studies; her countries of focus are South Korea (ROK), China, and Japan.

Why did you join AAS and why would you recommend AAS to your colleagues?

In 2015, I earned a Bachelor of Science in Interdisciplinary Studies with a focus on Asian Studies at Towson University. This concentration allowed me to study various disciplines such as language, philosophy, politics, geography, history, etc., all thematically centered on the Asian world. Since graduating, I have struggled to stay connected with the academics of the region. Therefore, I joined to have direct access to the research of the leading minds of field; to stay informed on the topics that interest me.

In addition, I earned a CELTA—the Certificate for Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages—in 2021. My passions for language and Asia motivated me to become an English Tutor with a focus on teaching students from Asia. By joining the AAS, there is the opportunity for me to connect with language experts from the region and to also keep learning about Asian societies so that my instruction remains culturally sensitive.

I would recommend my colleagues join the AAS so that they too can stay informed. Associations are a wonderful way to get involved in the things that you are passionate about. There are ways to be a part of this academic community outside of social media, and joining the AAS is one of them. It is meaningful and signifying, and is a way to show your dedication to the field.

How did you first become involved in the field of Asian Studies?

I am a classically trained singer and spent much of my adolescence and young adulthood being steeped in Western classical music. Music is my first passion but by the end of my junior year at college, I was ready for a change. Therefore, I first became involved in the field of Asian Studies as a student. I changed my major from Vocal Performance to Asian Studies so that I could gain a fresh perspective on life, culture, and academics. I think it is one of the best decisions I have ever made!

What do you enjoy most or what were your most rewarding experiences involving your work in Asian Studies?

I most enjoy connecting to the people from the other side of our planet. Being from Maryland, USA, East Asia is almost as far away from home as one can get. In 2014, I traveled to Tokyo, Japan to study abroad for the summer. I remember looking out from the plane window and thinking, “I don’t belong here.” But then the hospitality of the Japanese people was immediately and profoundly evident as I stepped off the plane. I was not home, and maybe I did not belong, but we were connected! It is a feeling that I now get to experience as a tutor, too. Maybe we all do not speak the same language, but there are basic human experiences that allows us to communicate and learn.

Tell us about your current or past research.

I have not been involved with any research. I will have to think of something good what that time comes!

What advice or recommendation do you have for students interested in a career in Asian Studies?

I would give them the advice that I would go back and give myself as a student: keep your mind open. Academics is a tough field to get into, but there is so much room to grow. Just keep learning and go easy on yourself if things are slow. Network and study a language, too! I promise it will teach you about so much more than just words and grammar.

Outside of Asian Studies, tell us something fun or interesting about yourself.

When I was in Japan I stayed with a lovely host family. One night, after dinner, my host-family brought out grapes for dessert. We all grabbed one and I took a bite at mine. However, they did not – they squeezed out the flesh and discarded the skin. Everyone looked at me in bewilderment and asked, “what are you doing?” I looked back at them equally as confused and asked, “what are you doing?” We all then burst into laughter. As it turns out there are different species of grapes in Japan that I had never eaten before! The skins on the Japanese variety are too tough to chew!

Call for Applications: Academic Writing for International Publication Workshop

Photo credit: StartupStockPhotos from Pixabay

22-23 June 2023, Daegu, South Korea

Presented by the Association for Asian Studies with support from Sweden

Deadline for Submitting Applications: 15 April 2023

The Association for Asian Studies is pleased to announce a workshop for junior scholars aimed at promoting the publication of research articles in international journals. The workshop will take place on Thursday and Friday, 22–23 June 2023, at Kyungpook National University (KNU) in Daegu, South Korea, and will be hosted by KNU. Workshop sessions will take place on Thursday afternoon and all day Friday. Participants will need to arrive in Daegu by midday on June 22nd at the latest.

Participants will attend presentations explaining what editors look for in evaluating manuscripts and common mistakes that authors make. Presenters will also discuss English-language writing conventions, effective ways to present Asian data to international audiences, handling referees’ reports, and selecting a journal.

Each participant will also attend an individual session with one of the mentors, who will review their manuscripts and discuss what might be done to help prepare it for submission to an international journal.

The workshop is designed for scholars in the humanities and social sciences, including but not restricted to Anthropology, Economics, History, Political Science, Psychology, and Sociology.

Application Forms

Application forms can be downloaded below or by clicking here. Completed applications and draft manuscripts must be received by midnight (US EDT) on 15 April 2023. Successful applicants will be notified by 30 April 2023.

Please note that workshop participants will be responsible for their own travel and lodging. Lunch will be provided for workshop attendees.

The Workshop Mentors

Dr. Paul H. Kratoska is a former editor of the Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, a former director of the National University of Singapore Press, and current editor of the Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society. His research interests focus on Southeast Asia, and he has published books and articles on the Japanese Occupation of Malaya, the history of rice cultivation in Southeast Asia, nationality and citizenship, and school history textbooks.

Dr. Mark P. Bradley is Bernadotte E. Schmitt Distinguished Service Professor of International History and the College at the University of Chicago, and editor of the American Historical Review. His research interests include twentieth-century U.S. international history, global history of human-rights politics, and postcolonial Southeast Asia. He is currently preparing a history of the global South and is the general editor of the forthcoming Cambridge History of America and the World.

Dr. Linda Grove represents the U.S. Social Science Research Council and the Harvard-Yenching Institute in Tokyo. She formerly taught Chinese social and economic history at Sophia University, where she served as dean and as vice president with responsibility for international programs and research management. Her publications include books and articles on Chinese rural industrialization and social change, East Asian trade history, and Chinese women’s history, as well as translations of Japanese and Chinese scholarship on Chinese history.

Michael Duckworth is Publisher of Hong Kong University Press. He previously served as Publisher of University of Hawaii Press, Executive Editor at University of Washington Press, and Director of American University of Cairo Press. 

The application period for this workshop has now ended.

Mai Takeuchi Receives 2023 Hamako Ito Chaplin Award

The Hamako Ito Chaplin Memorial Award Committee is pleased to announce that Dr. Mai Takeuchi (Lecturer of Japanese, University of California, Los Angeles) is the recipient of the 2023 Hamako Ito Chaplin Memorial Award for Excellence in Japanese Language Teaching. Dr. Takeuchi has a background in Japanese language pedagogy, pragmatics, and sociolinguistics, and she has a range of teaching experience from elementary and high school to the university level. She is described as approachable, creative, and informed. Dr. Takeuchi’s approach to language education emphasizes making language meaningful and impactful for the individual learner, especially in regard to self-expression. She has implemented pedagogical practices such as the multiliteracies framework and collaborative online international learning (COIL) to empower and provide opportunities for students to grow as active learners and active participants in the community. The selection committee would like to congratulate Dr. Takeuchi for her accomplishments and look forward to her continued contribution to Japanese language education. 

This award is made possible through the generous donation of Professor George Chaplin in memory of his wife, Hamako Ito Chaplin, who was a devoted, experienced, and well-respected professor of the Japanese language at Yale University for many years.

How Can Asianists Write General Guides to Research and Teaching?

Cover of "Where Research Begins: Choosing a Research Project that Matters to You (And the World)," by Thomas S. Mullaney and Christopher Rea

#AsiaNow speaks with Thomas S. Mullaney, Professor of History at Stanford University, and Christopher Rea, Professor of Asian Studies at the University of British Columbia, about their new book, Where Research Begins: Choosing a Research Project That Matters to You (and the World) (Chicago, 2022).

Where Research Begins is not an “Asian Studies” book, but rather a general guide to doing research. How did you come to write it?

Tom: The idea for the book started about twenty years ago with a monumental failure in the classroom. Back in grad school, Chris and I were assigned to teach a course on research methodology for undergrads, and we designed a syllabus that covered all the normal bases: working with primary sources, notetaking, annotated bibliographies, outlining… everything you might find in a book like The Craft of Research. We mapped out a step-by-step, semester-long plan which—at least in our minds—a student could follow to complete an original research proposal.

But it didn’t work. One by one, our students got stuck. We had built this bullet train to a successful research project, but everyone was just wandering around on the departure platform grappling with the same dilemma: What should I work on? I’m interested in Topic X, but where should I take it? I have lots of ideas, but which one should I choose? I found an interesting source, but what do I do with it? Without a research question, they couldn’t follow any of our steps. Without knowing their passion, they couldn’t transform it into a project.

Some students chose to settle, selecting a topic that didn’t excite them, and then dutifully working through our program. But it was clear that they had chosen their topics simply because they had to choose something. It was disheartening and stressful for everyone.

We came to realize that we’d made a common mistake. We forgot that the most challenging part of research is the part before you begin, when you don’t know what questions you want to ask or what problem you want to solve. We looked around and discovered that there are plenty of books that explain the “research process” to researchers who already know what their question or problem is, but none designed to help a researcher figure out what their question or problem is in the first place. 

So Chris and I decided to write a book about where research begins. Not just for students of Asian Studies, and not just for students in the Humanities, but for all students—and really for all researchers—working in any field. 

What are some of your key pieces of advice for people starting a new research project?

Chris: Ask yourself: “What’s my problem?” What is the personal and profound disturbance hiding beneath my topic, or my case study? Much of the book is about specific ways to tune into your own curiosities, motivations, and assumptions. The “Go Small, or Go Home” exercise, for example, involves writing down the things you wonder about a topic or a source, and then identifying patterns in those questions, so that you don’t jump to a question and miss your problem. It’s important to be in touch with your problem before you venture into “the literature,” that vast realm of voices and agendas. If you skip the introspection, it’s easy to get knocked off center and to end up following someone else’s program. 

When you do figure out your problem, however—and we share a bunch of techniques for doing this—several great things can happen. You can distinguish between your problem and cases of your problem, so that you can develop a Plan B if you need to. It also becomes much easier to pinpoint the studies that help you the most, especially studies outside your field. 

Suddenly, your “literature review” is driven by problems, and is not just a summary of topics. You’re more motivated. You can figure out which sources truly matter to your project, and get out of the weeds faster. You are better able to see the significance of your study. And there are other benefits too, some of which we describe in this piece on why you should never try to “narrow down” a research topic.

How did your training in Asian Studies affect how you wrote the book, if at all?

Tom: When you study in Asia within the context of the American academy, you get asked a lot of questions about the “significance” of whatever you’re working on. Were I to tell someone I’m working on the American Civil War, or the history of Apple Computers, four times out of five I wouldn’t be put in the hot seat to explain why I would want to work on something like that. When you work on subject matter that is less well known (Asian history, say), you are constantly asked—explicitly or implicitly—to justify your existence. Frustrating as it might be, the prompt is ultimately productive. It pushes you to think deeply about why even a “self-evidently important topic” matters to the world, and even more importantly, to the researcher. 

I’ve had students of U.S. history tell me of their interest in the U.S. Civil War, or gender in popular American culture, or the French Revolution, and rather than just accepting their answer, I try to get them to reveal the deeper concerns they have about that subject. I then try to give them the time and the safety they need to answer such questions honestly. No one—and we mean no one—finds their passion due to “gaps in the literature.” People find their passions in late-night phone calls with distant friends, in screaming matches with family members after an election, in the little acts of noticing that we do every day as we ride to work. 

Working in Asian Studies—and having to constantly answer “why” questions in a place where most people are unfamiliar with even the ABCs of Chinese history—has helped foster these habits in me, both as a researcher, and as a research mentor. 

Chris: The book is structured around exercises we call “Try This Now,” many of which we developed in Asian Studies courses. “Go Small, or Go Home” (about the power of “meaningless” questions), “Make Your Assumptions Visible” (but don’t disabuse yourself!), “Change One Variable” (for distinguishing case and problem), “Before and After” (getting your story straight), and others have roots in our work in Chinese history and literature, even though in the book we sometimes use non-China examples.

What would be an example of a methodology or theory of research that was influenced by your work in Asian Studies?

Chris: “Problem Collective” is a good example. Problem Collective is the term we use for all those researchers who—whether living or dead and no matter their field or discipline—share your research problem. Think of those moments when you come across a study whose author truly gets what you’re doing, who shares the central concern of your project. Or when you read a book from a different field that seems to “unlock” your project. It’s not only a thrilling sensation, but a connection that inspires you to think about your project in new ways, and enhances your ability to recognize other cases of your problem. 

Speaking personally, I was inspired by the Chinese notion of the zhiyin 知音, “a person who knows the tone,” who is on the same wavelength as you. In my first book on the history of laughter in China I discuss Qian Zhongshu’s 1930s essay “On Laughter,” in which he describes humor as a meeting of hearts and minds, a resonance that carries. As he puts it: “Perhaps only hundreds of years and tens of thousands of miles hence will [the humorist] find a kindred spirit, standing on the opposite bank of time and space, who smiles back.” He could just as well be talking about the magical moment when we find a kindred spirit in research.

What would be your suggestions for AAS members who want to reach audiences outside of the field of Asian Studies?

Chris: A simple but powerful way to connect with audiences outside your field is to ask yourself: “What does the world call my problem?” What vocabulary do they use? Will they understand my acronyms? What is the scenario that connects my [Asian studies] case with other cases that might be more familiar to my audience? Which analogies can I harness to help audiences understand the core issue?

Tom: Chris makes a great point here. Also, to reach audiences outside of the field of Asian Studies, it is important for AAS members to learn from colleagues who have successfully done so. Select 5 to 10 works within the discipline that you admire, and closely examine their footnotes, paying close attention to non-Asian Studies secondary sources that seem to be of particular important to the author (these tend to show up in the introduction, as well as opening and closing sections of chapters and articles). Also pay attention to the acknowledgments section and any scholars you don’t immediately recognize as part of the Asian Studies community. Who are they engaging with? How are they engaging? Are they writing in a way that effectively communicates with these audiences? Or are they mired in acronyms (to return to Chris’s point) in a way that is likely to exclude rather than welcome these potential readerships? 

 Are you two collaborating on any new projects?

Tom: In the short term, we’re looking forward to working with the Chinese translators of Where Research Begins. We’re excited that there will be at least five Asian editions of the book. The Korean edition was just published, and editions are forthcoming in China, Japan, Thailand, and Taiwan.

Chris: We are also working on a book about how to talk about your research before your research is done. This will be less about how to present a finished study than how to make better use of opportunities to speak about a work in progress to improve the study itself. At its heart is how to turn uncertainty into a productive, generative force—in office hours conversations, at conferences, when talking to publishers, even in job talks. After all, the most common state of research is unfinished!