Education About Asia: Online Archives

Asian Cultural Traditions

Download PDF



416 PAGES, PAPERBACK: ISBN 57766-043-9



After nearly two decades of research on Asia, I was surprised to find a book that offered a truly new approach to teaching Asia: Carolyn Brown Heinz’s Asian Cultural Traditions. While there are many excellent books on individual Asian countries, books that treat all of Asia are relatively uncommon. This is under­standable since covering all of Asia in a single book is a daunting task given Asia’s diversity. Various authors cope with this by simplistic overviews or leaving large gaps by focusing on aspects of Asia famil­iar to them. While these are useful and informative, I have been vaguely dissatisfied—particularly for teaching—because the end result has been jumbled. Brown avoids the fallacy of finding a unity in Asia (or “The Orient”) that does not exist, as many writers did in the nineteenth and early twentieth century.

Brown points out that she is not intent on covering countries one at a time. Indeed, she reminds us that the current legal boundaries of all Asian nation states (with the single possible exception of Japan) did not exist one hundred years ago.

Using a truly novel interdisciplinary approach, Brown tells us she organizes her book about “all of Asia” around a number of major themes.

First, Brown considers Asia spatially and deals with its underly­ing geography, focusing on the importance of the geological move­ment of the South Asian (or Indian) subcontinent from the coast of Africa to Asia. Not only did this create the world’s highest moun­tains (the Himalayas and Tibetan plateau), it also created the river valleys that drain the southern portion of East Asia.

Second, she considers Asia in terms of cultural evolution. Rec­ognizing that Chinese and Indian civilizations are the two main dominant cultures in Asia, she points out the cultural impact of each civilization on their neighbors. This was not necessarily positive. Linguistically, Japan might have been better served if it borrowed its written language from India since India and Japan both have poly­syllabic languages. Southeast Asian countries might have been bet­ter off, had they borrowed their written language from China since at least some Southeast Asian countries have monosyllabic lan­guages as do the Chinese. The natural diversity of languages is thereby further complicated. This conclusion flows naturally into her third major theme in which she examines Asia linguistically. Through an appropriate use of charts, maps, and text, she explains Asia’s linguistic diversity better than any other account of which I am aware.

I was impressed with the text, and was surprised and delighted with the success I encountered using it in the classroom. I suspect Brown’s approach may alter the way Asian culture is taught.

All themes are well crafted for use in the classroom. I was impressed with the text, and was surprised and delighted with the success I encountered using it in the classroom. I suspect Brown’s approach may alter the way Asian culture is taught. Even if I’m wrong about this, Brown has contributed an important interdiscipli­nary book for use as a supplement to a wide variety of historical, political science, and anthropology classes in colleges. The author has incorporated more than sixty maps, charts, and photos (black and white) to enliven the text and support its usefulness as a text. Those interested in tying the language questions to the cultural, social, and anthropological issues will appreciate the series of tables explaining the degree to which Asian languages compare and con­trast with one another. “Boxed readings” in each chapter support its pedagogical function. A few changes may be helpful in future edi­tions. Some of the material included in the chapter endnotes would probably be better if included directly in the text, and more attention should be paid to making sure the place names are fully and proper­ly identified. Despite clear attempts to make it easy for students to use, some facts known to specialists may be unfamiliar to college students. Overall, I found Heinz’s work commendable.